From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phinpathya v. I.N.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 18, 1989
892 F.2d 83 (9th Cir. 1989)

Summary

holding no deliberate indifference where the inmate "wanted a complete root canal treatment and the dentists recommended extraction"

Summary of this case from Fowler v. Sisolak

Opinion


892 F.2d 83 (9th Cir. 1989) Padungsri PHINPATHYA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 84-7837. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit December 18, 1989

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Argued and Submitted July 10, 1986.

Submission Vacated Jan. 6, 1987.

Bd. Immigration Appeals.

DISMISSED.

Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Before CANBY, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and MARIANA R. PFAELZER, District Judge.

Honorable Mariana R. Pfaelzer, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

ORDER

The case is hereby resubmitted. The Court having been advised that petitioner has been granted temporary and permanent residency, the Petition is dismissed as moot.


Summaries of

Phinpathya v. I.N.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 18, 1989
892 F.2d 83 (9th Cir. 1989)

holding no deliberate indifference where the inmate "wanted a complete root canal treatment and the dentists recommended extraction"

Summary of this case from Fowler v. Sisolak
Case details for

Phinpathya v. I.N.S.

Case Details

Full title:Padungsri PHINPATHYA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 18, 1989

Citations

892 F.2d 83 (9th Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

Fowler v. Sisolak

See Swartz v. Steinhauser, No. 97-15721, 125 F.3d 859, 1997 WL 599547, at *1 (9th Cir. 1997) (stating that…

Pipes v. U.S.

Other courts, however, have held or suggested that following an extraction-only policy would not violate the…