From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. Wakemed

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 26, 2022
No. 21-2301 (4th Cir. May. 26, 2022)

Opinion

21-2301

05-26-2022

LATOYA PHILLIPS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WAKEMED, Defendant-Appellee.

Latoya Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. David Ransom Ortiz, Kerry Shad, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: May 24, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:20-cv-00626-M)

Latoya Phillips, Appellant Pro Se.

David Ransom Ortiz, Kerry Shad, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Latoya Phillips appeals the district court's order granting WakeMed's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Phillips v. WakeMed, No. 5:20-cv-00626-M (E.D. N.C. Oct. 19, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Phillips v. Wakemed

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 26, 2022
No. 21-2301 (4th Cir. May. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Phillips v. Wakemed

Case Details

Full title:LATOYA PHILLIPS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WAKEMED, Defendant-Appellee.

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 26, 2022

Citations

No. 21-2301 (4th Cir. May. 26, 2022)