From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. Delaney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 5, 2020
19 CIVIL 5113 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 5, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 5113 (NSR)

10-05-2020

CHARLES PHILLIPS, ALFRED J. VENT, each individually as residents and as area representatives in Prospect Park, and JAY WEINBERGER, as resident of Prospect Park, Plaintiffs, v. KERRY A. DELANEY, individually and as Acting Commissioner of the Office for Persons With Developmental Disabilities; OFFICE OF PERSONS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; STANLEY SILVERSTEIN, individually and as Director of the Institutes of Applied Human Dynamics; INSTITUTES OF APPLIED HUMAN DYNAMICS; MARY T. ST. MARKS, as President of the Board of Directors for Institutes of Applied Human Dynamics; THOMAS ROACH, individually and as Mayor of the City of White Plains, New York; and as the CITY OF WHITE PLAINS, NEW YORK, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated October 2, 2020, Defendants' motions to dismiss the Amended Complaint are GRANTED, and the motion for sanctions filed by Defendants City of White Plains and Thomas Roach is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiffs' public and private nuisance claims are dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. All other claims are dismissed with prejudice; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

October 5, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Phillips v. Delaney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 5, 2020
19 CIVIL 5113 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 5, 2020)
Case details for

Phillips v. Delaney

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES PHILLIPS, ALFRED J. VENT, each individually as residents and as…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 5, 2020

Citations

19 CIVIL 5113 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 5, 2020)