From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. Culliver

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Oct 16, 2009
CIVIL ACTION 06-00816-KD-B (S.D. Ala. Oct. 16, 2009)

Summary

holding petitions for writ of mandamus in the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals and the Alabama Supreme Court that challenged the denial of an application to proceed in forma pauperis and were ultimately denied "had no tolling effect"

Summary of this case from Falconer v. Estes

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 06-00816-KD-B.

October 16, 2009


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that petitioner's action be dismissed with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations.


Summaries of

Phillips v. Culliver

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Oct 16, 2009
CIVIL ACTION 06-00816-KD-B (S.D. Ala. Oct. 16, 2009)

holding petitions for writ of mandamus in the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals and the Alabama Supreme Court that challenged the denial of an application to proceed in forma pauperis and were ultimately denied "had no tolling effect"

Summary of this case from Falconer v. Estes

concluding inmate's application for post-conviction relief was not properly filed because inmate failed to pay the filing fee or meet the state's requirements for proceeding in forma pauperis

Summary of this case from Chilton v. Kelly

concluding inmate's application for post-conviction relief was not properly filed because inmate failed to pay the filing fee or meet the state's requirements for proceeding in forma pauperis

Summary of this case from Chilton v. Kelly

concluding inmate's application for post-conviction relief was not properly filed because inmate failed to pay the filing fee or meet the state's requirements for proceeding in forma pauperis

Summary of this case from Chilton v. Kelly
Case details for

Phillips v. Culliver

Case Details

Full title:SHANTA PHILLIPS, Petitioner, vs. GRANTT CULLIVER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 16, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 06-00816-KD-B (S.D. Ala. Oct. 16, 2009)

Citing Cases

Tharrington v. Director

Because Tharrington's petition was not properly filed, see Artuz, 531 U.S. at 8, Tharrington lacks…

Netting v. Sec'y, DOC

Ramirez v. Sec'y, DOC, No. 3:13-cv-979-J-39JRK, 2015 WL 6704312, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 3, 2015) (Not Reported…