From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Merino

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 9, 2016
208 So. 3d 714 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 3D15–2035.

11-09-2016

PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., Appellant, v. Carmenza MERINO, Appellee.

Arnold & Porter, LLP and Geoffrey J. Michael (Washington, DC); Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Kenneth J. Reilly, Miranda Lundeen Soto and J. Daniel Gardner ; Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and Amir C. Tayrani (Washington, DC), for appellant. Dolan Dobrinsky Rosenblum and Randy Rosenblum ; Michael S. Olin ; Velasquez Dolan Arias and Carlos A. Velasquez and Alejandro Larrazabal (Plantation); Brannock & Humphries, Celene H. Humphries, Maegen P. Luka, and Thomas J. Seider (Tampa); The Alvarez Law Firm and Alex Alvarez ; Freidin Brown and Philip Freidin, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Merino

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 9, 2016
208 So. 3d 714 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Merino

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., Appellant, v. Carmenza MERINO, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Nov 9, 2016

Citations

208 So. 3d 714 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)