Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc.

Full title: PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS E…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California

Date published: May 1, 2007

Civil 06cv0717 J (JMA) (S.D. Cal. May. 1, 2007)

Opinion

PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS E. BARNHART, INC., Defendant. Civil No. 06cv0717 J (JMA) United States District Court, S.D. California. May 1, 2007

          ORDER RE: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ALL RELATED ACTIONS.

          NAPOLEON A. JONES Jr., District Judge.

         Before the Court is a Joint Motion to Dismiss the claim of the Intervenor, Artimex Iron Co., Inc. ("Artimex"). [Doc. No. 33.] This Court, having reviewed the matter as stated above and finding good cause therefor, ORDERS that the claim of Intervenor Artimex be dismissed without prejudice, in accordance with the terms set forth. Such dismissal will not prejudice Artimex's claim for damages within the counter-claim of Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.