From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phelps v. Perez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 28, 2023
1:22-cv-01406-AWI-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-01406-AWI-SAB (PC)

03-28-2023

PAUL PHELPS, Plaintiff, v. MANUEL PEREZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS, AND REFERRING MATTER BACK TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS (ECF No. 9)

Plaintiff Paul Phelps is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On November 8, the Court screened Plaintiff's complaint and found a cognizable excessive force claim against Defendants Townsend and Bettis in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, a supervisory liability claim against Defendant Manuel Perez in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, and a Monell liability claim against the County of Madera in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. (ECF No. 5.) However, Plaintiff failed to state any other cognizable claims for relief. Plaintiff was informed that he could file an amended complaint or a notice of intent to proceed on the claims found to be cognizable. (Id.)

On November 17, 2022, Plaintiff notified the Court of his intent to proceed on the claims found to be cognizable. (ECF No. 7.)

On November 18, 2022, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued Findings and

Recommendations recommending that this action proceed on Plaintiff's excessive force claim against Defendants Townsend and Bettis, supervisory liability claim against Defendant Manuel Perez in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, and Monell liability claim against the County of Madera in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. (ECF No. 9.) The findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen days after service. (Id. at 2.) No objections were filed and the time to do so has passed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on November 18, 2022, (ECF No. 9), are adopted in full;
2. This action proceed on Plaintiffs excessive force claim against Defendants Townsend and Bettis in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, supervisory liability claim against Defendant Manuel Perez in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, and Monell liability claim against the County of Madera in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
3. All other claims are dismissed from this action for failure to state claims upon which relief may be granted; and
4. This action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for proceedings consistent with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Phelps v. Perez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 28, 2023
1:22-cv-01406-AWI-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Phelps v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:PAUL PHELPS, Plaintiff, v. MANUEL PEREZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Mar 28, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-01406-AWI-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2023)