From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phelps v. Carr

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts
Mar 26, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-40245-GAO (D. Mass. Mar. 26, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-40245-GAO.

March 26, 2010


ORDER


The plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Appointment of Counsel (dkt. no. 21) is DENIED without prejudice. The defendants' Second Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint (dkt. no. 22) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. The plaintiff's Motion for Stay in the Case or Motion for An Appointment of Counsel (dkt. no. 24) is DENIED without prejudice.

It is SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Phelps v. Carr

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts
Mar 26, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-40245-GAO (D. Mass. Mar. 26, 2010)
Case details for

Phelps v. Carr

Case Details

Full title:COY PHELPS, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER CARR and T. SMITH, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Massachusetts

Date published: Mar 26, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-40245-GAO (D. Mass. Mar. 26, 2010)

Citing Cases

Beach v. Smith

Furthermore, as the government recognizes in its motion to dismiss at 9, n.3, other district courts in this…