From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

P.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 3, 1986
489 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-927.

June 3, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Ralph B. Ferguson, Jr., J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.


P.H., a juvenile, appeals from an order adjudicating him to be a delinquent. It is appellant's contention that the trial judge erred in allowing into evidence, over defense objection, the juvenile's purported confession where the state breached its duty to disclose the statement as required by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.070(a)(1)(iii), and where the court failed to conduct an inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the discovery breach.

We find merit in appellant's contention and reverse. See Wilcox v. State, 367 So.2d 1020 (Fla. 1979); Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1971); Donahue v. State, 464 So.2d 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

P.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 3, 1986
489 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

P.H. v. State

Case Details

Full title:P.H., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 3, 1986

Citations

489 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

S.G. v. State

Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d at 775 (emphasis supplied). Richardson's requirements are, of course, equally…