From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pfeil v. Hasselbush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 8, 1937
249 App. Div. 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

January 8, 1937.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.; Close, J., not voting.


Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See ante, p. 766.] The following question is certified: Do the facts set forth in the second paragraph of the amended answer constitute a defense to the cause of action set forth in the complaint?


Summaries of

Pfeil v. Hasselbush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 8, 1937
249 App. Div. 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Pfeil v. Hasselbush

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES PFEIL, Appellant, v. AUGUST C. HASSELBUSH and EDWARD C. TINKER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 8, 1937

Citations

249 App. Div. 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)