From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pfeiffer v. Cinelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 7, 1991
174 A.D.2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

June 7, 1991

Appeal from the Erie County Family Court, O'Donnell, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition denied. Memorandum: Family Court erred in granting the petition for an upward modification of child support. The parties' separation agreement provided that the amount of child support was based on the parties' income at the "time of the divorce". The only direct evidence of respondent's income at the time of the divorce was his statement that he was earning $40,000 per year. That statement was supported by his 1988 tax return. When petitioner commenced this proceeding some 18 months later, respondent was still earning approximately $40,000 per year. Given those circumstances, petitioner's proof failed to establish an unanticipated and unreasonable change of circumstances to support an upward modification of child support (see, Matter of Boden v Boden, 42 N.Y.2d 210, 213).


Summaries of

Pfeiffer v. Cinelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 7, 1991
174 A.D.2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Pfeiffer v. Cinelli

Case Details

Full title:MARY J. PFEIFFER, Respondent, v. RONALD M. CINELLI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1991

Citations

174 A.D.2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
572 N.Y.S.2d 162

Citing Cases

Matter of Hulik v. Hulik

Likewise without merit is respondent's contention that the parties' change in circumstances warranted an…