From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pew v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 3, 2017
3:17cv9 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2017)

Opinion

3:17cv9

03-03-2017

ALFONSO PERCY PEW, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Corrections, SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL, Executive Deputy Secretary, STEVEN R. GLUNT, Regional Deputy Secretary, TRACEY SMITH, Director, Religious Accommodation Committee, and MARCIA NOLES, Food Services, Bureau of Health Care Services, Defendants.


Electronic Filing


Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff Alfonso Percy Pew ("Plaintiff") initiated this prisoner civil rights action on January 20, 2017, by filing a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, an affidavit alleging imminent danger, and a proposed civil rights complaint. (ECF No. 1.) That same day, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for all pretrial matters in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules of Court.

On February 8, 2017, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on Plaintiff's allegations of imminent danger. (ECF No. 3.) Following testimony from Plaintiff, and other Department of Corrections personnel, the Magistrate Judge ruled that Plaintiff was not in imminent danger of serious physical injury or harm. Therefore, in accordance with her Report and Recommendation that she filed on February 8, 2017, (ECF No. 4), the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be denied because he has three "strikes" that prohibit him from proceeding in forma pauperis without a showing of imminent danger. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff was served with the Report and Recommendation and advised that he had until February 27, 2017 to file objections. As of today, no objections have been filed. Therefore, after reviewing the record de novo, the Court is in agreement with the ultimate recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated February 8, 2017, (ECF No. 4), is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 1), is denied in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reopen it by paying the full $400.00 filing fee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Dated: March 3, 2017

/s/_________

David Stewart Cercone

United States District Judge cc: Honorable Lisa Pupo Lenihan,

United States Magistrate Judge

Alfonso Percy Pew

BT-7263

SCI Houtzdale

209 Institution Drive

P.O. Box 1000

Houtzdale, PA 16698

(Via First Class Mail)


Summaries of

Pew v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 3, 2017
3:17cv9 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2017)
Case details for

Pew v. Wetzel

Case Details

Full title:ALFONSO PERCY PEW, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Corrections…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 3, 2017

Citations

3:17cv9 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2017)