From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pettus v. Mazzola

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Mar 22, 2019
63 Misc. 3d 133 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

570031/19

03-22-2019

James PETTUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bryan MAZZOLA, Brett Carrick, and Boyd, Richards, Parker, Colonnelli, P.L., Defendants-Respondents.


Per Curiam.

Order (Brenda Rivera, J.), entered November 8, 2018, affirmed, without costs.

This small claims action was properly dismissed, since it was an improper collateral attack upon the June 16, 2015 vexatious litigation order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (see Matter of Pettus v. Board of Directors , 2018 NY Slip Op 78019[U], [1st Dept 2018] ; see also Vinokur v. Penny Lane Owners Corp. , 269 AD2d 226 [2000] ). Insofar as plaintiff contends that defendants, the attorneys for the defendant in the Bronx County action, falsely procured said order, plaintiff's remedy lies exclusively in that prior lawsuit itself, i.e., by moving to vacate the order due to its fraudulent procurement, not in a second plenary action collaterally attacking the order (see Yalkowsky v. Century Apts. Assoc. , 215 AD2d 214, 215 [1995] ).

We also reject plaintiff's challenge to that portion of the order on appeal barring him from initiating further litigation in the Civil Court without prior court approval (see Pettus v. Board of Directors , appeal numbered 19-061, decided herewith.)

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

Pettus v. Mazzola

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Mar 22, 2019
63 Misc. 3d 133 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

Pettus v. Mazzola

Case Details

Full title:James Pettus, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bryan Mazzola, Brett Carrick, and…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Mar 22, 2019

Citations

63 Misc. 3d 133 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 50395
114 N.Y.S.3d 156