From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pettigrew v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 3, 2017
Case No. 2:16-cv-03012-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Apr. 3, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2:16-cv-03012-APG-NJK

04-03-2017

DONNELLE PETTIGREW, Plaintiff, v. TOM WILSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

(DKT. NO. 17)

On March 2, 2017, Magistrate Judge Koppe entered a report and recommendation that I dismiss this case without prejudice for failure to allege facts supporting subject matter jurisdiction. ECF No. 17. Pettigrew did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made"); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Koppe's report and recommendation (ECF No. 17) is accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Donnelle Pettigrew's third amended complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.

DATED this 3rd day of April, 2017.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pettigrew v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 3, 2017
Case No. 2:16-cv-03012-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Apr. 3, 2017)
Case details for

Pettigrew v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:DONNELLE PETTIGREW, Plaintiff, v. TOM WILSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 3, 2017

Citations

Case No. 2:16-cv-03012-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Apr. 3, 2017)