Summary
finding that the ALJ erred in rejecting the opinions of a treating physician because insufficient detail was set forth by the ALJ for the reviewing court to be able to conduct any kind of meaningful analysis
Summary of this case from Gray v. ColvinOpinion
CIVIL ACTION 06-00880-WS-B.
April 21, 2008
ORDER
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated March 26, 2008, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
DONE and ORDERED.