From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petrova v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 29, 1927
245 N.Y. 518 (N.Y. 1927)

Summary

In Petrova v. Roberts (245 N.Y. 518), the Court of Appeals affirmed the vacatur of a service of a nonresident defendant attending court as a plaintiff under circumstances strikingly similar to the case at bar.

Summary of this case from Landsman v. Rabinowitz

Opinion

Submitted February 23, 1927

Decided March 29, 1927

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Ralph A. Gilchrist and Charles T. Lark for appellant.

Melville H. Cane for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, ANDREWS, LEHMAN, KELLOGG and O'BRIEN, JJ.


Summaries of

Petrova v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 29, 1927
245 N.Y. 518 (N.Y. 1927)

In Petrova v. Roberts (245 N.Y. 518), the Court of Appeals affirmed the vacatur of a service of a nonresident defendant attending court as a plaintiff under circumstances strikingly similar to the case at bar.

Summary of this case from Landsman v. Rabinowitz
Case details for

Petrova v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:OLGA PETROVA, Appellant, v. WILLIAM H. ROBERTS, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 29, 1927

Citations

245 N.Y. 518 (N.Y. 1927)

Citing Cases

Barbella v. Yale

The defendant appeared herein specially and solely for the purpose of moving to vacate the service of process…

Zirinsky v. Zirinsky

In New York a nonresident party who begins litigation in his own interest against a citizen of this state is…