From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petrosyan v. Ali

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 25, 2013
1:09cv0593 AWI DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2013)

Opinion

1:09cv0593 AWI DLB PC

02-25-2013

ARTHUR PETROSYAN, Plaintiff, v. ALI, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REGARDING CALENDARING

OF MOTION TO DISMISS


(Document 52)

Plaintiff Arthur Petrosyan is proceeding with counsel in this civil rights action.1

On February 19, 2013, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the action, but did set a hearing date. As Plaintiff is represented by counsel, Local Rule 230(l) does not apply and the motion must be set before the assigned District Court Judge.

However, the parties may stipulate to have the matter submitted upon the briefs and waive oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g).

Accordingly, within fifteen (15) days, the parties SHALL either submit a stipulation to waiv oral argument OR set the motion to be heard before the District Court Judge. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Petrosyan v. Ali

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 25, 2013
1:09cv0593 AWI DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Petrosyan v. Ali

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR PETROSYAN, Plaintiff, v. ALI, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Citations

1:09cv0593 AWI DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2013)