Opinion
NO. 14-16-00468-CV
07-12-2016
PETROLIA GROUP, LLC AND PETROLIA CONSOLIDATED RESOURCES, LLC, Appellants v. ZIMMERMAN, AXELRAD, MEYER, STERN & WISE, PC AND BRIAN ZIMMERMAN, Appellees
On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2015-09761
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from an order compelling arbitration signed May 13, 2016. On June 14, 2016, appellees filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Appellants have not filed a response.
Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until final judgment is entered unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Here, the trial court's order compelling arbitration remains interlocutory and unappealable; thus, this court is without jurisdiction to consider the instant appeal. See Elm Creek Villas Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Beldon Roofing & Remodeling, Co., 940 S.W.2d 150 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no writ) (concluding court of appeals had no jurisdiction over interlocutory order compelling arbitration); Bethke v. Polyco, Inc., 730 S.W.2d 431, 434 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1987, no writ) (holding an order compelling arbitration is not an appealable judgment); Citizens Nat'l Bank of Beaumont v. Callaway, 597 S.W.2d 465, 466 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1980, writ refd) (holding appellate court has no jurisdiction over an order requiring the parties to arbitrate).
Accordingly, the motion is granted, and the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Busby, Donovan, and Wise.