From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petriski v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 5, 1958
5 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

March 5, 1958

Appeal from the Herkimer County Court.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Goldman, JJ.


Judgment modified on the law and facts by striking therefrom the sum of $85, with interest of $12.62, a total of $97.62, and as modified affirmed, with costs to the appellants. Memorandum: Defendants were prospective buyers of the property in question, and utilized part of the premises for a period of time with the acquiescence of one of the plaintiffs, who was in possession as a tenant by the entirety. Under these circumstances the relationship of landlord and tenant did not arise, and the verdict of the jury was contrary to the law and the facts insofar as it awarded the sum of $85 to plaintiff for the "use and occupancy of certain lands and premises" by the defendants. (See Castle v. Armstead, 168 App. Div. 466, affd. 219 N.Y. 615.) All concur.


Summaries of

Petriski v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 5, 1958
5 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Petriski v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:HELEN PETRISKI, as Committee of the Person and Property of JOSEPH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 5, 1958

Citations

5 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

Koppelman v. Barrett

Thus, when the parties executed the contract of sale, occupants, who were in possession of the premises,…

Koppelman v. Barrett

Thus, when the parties executed the contract of sale, occupants, who were in possession of the premises,…