Petitjean v. Novo Nordisk Inc.

Full title: LISA PETITJEAN, Plaintiff, v. NOVO NORDISK INC., MARGO VOLPE, and DOES 1…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 13, 2013

13-cv-02223 TLN-DAD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2013)

Opinion

LISA PETITJEAN, Plaintiff, v. NOVO NORDISK INC., MARGO VOLPE, and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants. No. 13-cv-02223 TLN-DAD United States District Court, E.D. California. December 13, 2013

          ORDER

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Lisa Petijean's motion to remand to Sacramento County Superior Court. (See Pl.'s Mot. to Remand, ECF 7.) Defendant Novo Nordisk, Inc. ("Defendant") has filed a statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff's motion to remand. (See Def.'s Statement of Non-Opp'n, ECF 13.)

         Defendant removed this case from Sacramento County Superior Court to this court on October 13, 2013, on the basis of federal question jurisdiction. (Def.'s Notice of Removal, ECF 1.) Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on November 05, 2013, omitting the federal claims asserted in Plaintiff's original complaint. (Pl.'s First Am. Compl., ECF 6)

         Because the operative complaint is now devoid of any federal claims, and because Defendant does not oppose remand, Plaintiff's motion to remand is GRANTED. This case is hereby remanded to Sacramento County Superior Court. The clerk of the court is directed to close the case.