Summary
holding that an objection on the grounds of hearsay and relevance does not preserve a claim of error made under OEC 403
Summary of this case from State v. RobertsOpinion
December 17, 1991.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 17, 1991
312 Or. 527 (Or. 1991)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 17, 1991
312 Or. 527 (Or. 1991)
holding that an objection on the grounds of hearsay and relevance does not preserve a claim of error made under OEC 403
Summary of this case from State v. Robertsdiscussing both express and implied permission before concluding that sub-permittee had policyholder's implied permission to drive covered automobile
Summary of this case from Allstate Insurance Co. v. LupoliCase details for
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Dec 17, 1991
Citations
312 Or. 527 (Or. 1991)
Citing Cases
Sanderson v. Mark
The proper area of inquiry for an expert witness is not "standard of care," a legal concept, but, rather,…
Yager and YagerDetermining whether an individual is qualified to testify as an expert witness is a matter that falls within…