Summary
explaining that, to satisfy ORS 144.135, the board order must state a basis for “why the Board did what it did”
Summary of this case from Jenkins v. Bd. of ParoleOpinion
November 20, 1980.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 20, 1980
290 Or. 157 (Or. 1980)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 20, 1980
290 Or. 157 (Or. 1980)
explaining that, to satisfy ORS 144.135, the board order must state a basis for “why the Board did what it did”
Summary of this case from Jenkins v. Bd. of ParoleCase details for
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Nov 20, 1980
Citations
290 Or. 157 (Or. 1980)
Citing Cases
Wise v. Hays
Defendant moved to dismiss the petition, arguing that mandamus would not lie, because the Board's decision…
Willaby v. Board of ParoleI also note that the Board produces a reviewable record in this type of proceeding. ORS 144.228 (2); OAR…