holding service was adequate when left with wife whom defendant has regular, frequent, and predicable contacts with, and whom process server knew would be visited by defendant in the near future
Summary of this case from Roller v. Herrera1993.
holding service was adequate when left with wife whom defendant has regular, frequent, and predicable contacts with, and whom process server knew would be visited by defendant in the near future
Summary of this case from Roller v. Herreraholding service was adequate when left with wife whom defendant has regular, frequent, and predicable contacts with, and whom process server knew would be visited by defendant in the near future
Summary of this case from Busher v. Berthiaumeupholding the validity of a substantively similar, antecedent version of OAR 660-033-0020(b); reasoning that the rule "simply acknowledge[d] that land within farm units is suitable for farm use and is therefore within the definition of agricultural land in Goal 3"
Summary of this case from Wetherell v. Douglas CountyFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1993
We reverse the award of attorney fees to plaintiff and otherwise affirm. Plaintiff George Stein initiated…
Boyd v. BoydWe considered similar facts in two recent cases. In Duber v. Zietler, 118 Or. App. 597, 848 P.2d 642, rev den…