From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1998
327 Or. 431 (Or. 1998)

Summary

concluding that title vested, as a matter of law, when the requirements of adverse possession were met, and finding it unnecessary to consider the nature and frequency of the defendants’ activities on the property after they moved away from it

Summary of this case from Glenn v. Glenn

Opinion

1998.


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1998
327 Or. 431 (Or. 1998)

concluding that title vested, as a matter of law, when the requirements of adverse possession were met, and finding it unnecessary to consider the nature and frequency of the defendants’ activities on the property after they moved away from it

Summary of this case from Glenn v. Glenn

explaining the two-step inquiry under ORS 20.105

Summary of this case from Horton v. Nelson

noting judicial obligation "to give full meaning and effect to all relevant statutory provisions"

Summary of this case from Hazell v. Brown

illustrating principle in context of statutory construction

Summary of this case from Piburn v. Saif

noting that evidence supported the trial court's "implicit finding" that the party found liable for conversion "did not act in complete good faith"

Summary of this case from Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific Transportation
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 1, 1998

Citations

327 Or. 431 (Or. 1998)

Citing Cases

Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific Transportation

The Supreme Court and our court have repeatedly reiterated and applied that formulation, including the…

Mid-Valley Resources v. Engelson

We begin with the pure mistake doctrine. The trial court, acting in accordance with our earlier decisions in…