concluding that title vested, as a matter of law, when the requirements of adverse possession were met, and finding it unnecessary to consider the nature and frequency of the defendants’ activities on the property after they moved away from it
Summary of this case from Glenn v. Glenn1998.
concluding that title vested, as a matter of law, when the requirements of adverse possession were met, and finding it unnecessary to consider the nature and frequency of the defendants’ activities on the property after they moved away from it
Summary of this case from Glenn v. Glennexplaining the two-step inquiry under ORS 20.105
Summary of this case from Horton v. Nelsonnoting judicial obligation "to give full meaning and effect to all relevant statutory provisions"
Summary of this case from Hazell v. Brownillustrating principle in context of statutory construction
Summary of this case from Piburn v. Saifnoting that evidence supported the trial court's "implicit finding" that the party found liable for conversion "did not act in complete good faith"
Summary of this case from Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
The Supreme Court and our court have repeatedly reiterated and applied that formulation, including the…
Mid-Valley Resources v. EngelsonWe begin with the pure mistake doctrine. The trial court, acting in accordance with our earlier decisions in…