determining that the appellant posed a danger to others when, although he had committed no overt violent acts against anyone, there was ample evidence to form a foundation for predicting that he would
Summary of this case from State v. M. R1992.
determining that the appellant posed a danger to others when, although he had committed no overt violent acts against anyone, there was ample evidence to form a foundation for predicting that he would
Summary of this case from State v. M. Rexplaining that "[a]lthough we review equitable proceedings de novo, we review procedural rulings made in the course of those proceedings only for abuse of discretion"
Summary of this case from Matter of WilliamsFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
This court has revisited the issue of preemption several times, wrestling with the footnote in…
Scappoose v. Columbia CountyUnder the view we take, it is not critical to the jurisdictional determination here whether plaintiff is or…