holding that, "when the final [support] payment was made, the obligation was discharged" and, after that date, "husband had no obligation that could support a modification"
Summary of this case from Stansell v. Stansell (In re Marriage of Stansell)December 12, 1989.
holding that, "when the final [support] payment was made, the obligation was discharged" and, after that date, "husband had no obligation that could support a modification"
Summary of this case from Stansell v. Stansell (In re Marriage of Stansell)holding that the trial court was without authority to modify a spousal support obligation when the modification proceeding was initiated ten years after the obligation to pay spousal support under the dissolution judgment had been terminated by order
Summary of this case from Harkins and Harkinsholding that, "[a]s with a promissory note, when the final payment was made [on a support judgment], the obligation was discharged" and after that date "husband had no obligation that could support a modification"
Summary of this case from Harkins and Harkinsholding that Article I, section 10, is not violated when the injured party is left with a substantial remedy
Summary of this case from Stone v. Finnertydiscussing compelled informal interview
Summary of this case from Grobovsky v. Bd. of Med. exFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Dec 12, 1989
The workers' compensation law does operate as a substitute for the common law regarding claims for that kind…
Stansell v. Stansell (In re Marriage of Stansell)First, we have held that, when an obligation to pay spousal support terminates, the obligation effectively…