holding that an ordinance prohibiting the operation of a sound-reproducing device on the public right-of-way that was audible fifty feet or more from the device "obviously does not prohibit speech"
Summary of this case from City of Nyssa v. DuflothMay 31, 1989.
holding that an ordinance prohibiting the operation of a sound-reproducing device on the public right-of-way that was audible fifty feet or more from the device "obviously does not prohibit speech"
Summary of this case from City of Nyssa v. Duflothaffirming judgment for the defendants upon conversion claim, noting, inter alia, that "[f]rom the evidence, the court could have found that defendants asserted the lien in good faith and believed that they were acting within their `legal rights'"
Summary of this case from Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: May 31, 1989
Destruction of evidence or increased danger to police officers or others may constitute exigent…
Grady v. Cedar Side Inn, Inc.We held that the plaintiff could not recover. In so holding, we explained that, although there once existed a…