From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1997
326 Or. 133 (Or. 1997)

Summary

interpreting a former version of OAR 436–060–0040 to require continuation of temporary disability benefits “during the period between completion of a training program and issuance of a redetermination order if the worker is medically stationary, is not entitled to additional permanent disability awards and is not working”

Summary of this case from Liberty Nw. Ins. Corp. v. Olvera-Chavez (In re Comp. of Olvera-Chavez)

Opinion

1997.


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1997
326 Or. 133 (Or. 1997)

interpreting a former version of OAR 436–060–0040 to require continuation of temporary disability benefits “during the period between completion of a training program and issuance of a redetermination order if the worker is medically stationary, is not entitled to additional permanent disability awards and is not working”

Summary of this case from Liberty Nw. Ins. Corp. v. Olvera-Chavez (In re Comp. of Olvera-Chavez)
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 1, 1997

Citations

326 Or. 133 (Or. 1997)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Dyer

In Oregon, plaintiff must allege and prove the Chesterman requirements. G.L., 306 Or at 60; see also Lourim…

State v. Norris

" See also Meltebeke v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 322 Or. 132, 157, 903 P.2d 351 (1995) ("The rules…