From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jun 5, 2001
332 Or. 239 (Or. 2001)

Summary

noting that the court's explanation of the concept of discretion in Rogers applies to our review of decisions based on ORCP 64 B

Summary of this case from Golik v. CBS Corp.

Opinion

May 29, 2001

June 5, 2001

May 29, 2001

June 5, 2001


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jun 5, 2001
332 Or. 239 (Or. 2001)

noting that the court's explanation of the concept of discretion in Rogers applies to our review of decisions based on ORCP 64 B

Summary of this case from Golik v. CBS Corp.

declining plaintiff's invitation to apply federal case law under FRCP 60(b) because federal rule differs from ORCP 64 B

Summary of this case from Dewolf v. Mt. Hood Ski Bowl, LLC

extending liability for wrongful initiation of civil proceedings to "active participants"

Summary of this case from Mantia v. Hanson
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jun 5, 2001

Citations

332 Or. 239 (Or. 2001)

Citing Cases

Wallace v. Holden

We concluded that such a dismissal would improperly preclude the plaintiff from pursuing his claim against…

Vokoun v. City of Lake Oswego

Whether denominated a claim for "loss of lateral support" or otherwise, plaintiffs' claim for the cost of…