Summary
noting that the court's explanation of the concept of discretion in Rogers applies to our review of decisions based on ORCP 64 B
Summary of this case from Golik v. CBS Corp.Opinion
May 29, 2001
June 5, 2001
May 29, 2001
June 5, 2001
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jun 5, 2001
332 Or. 239 (Or. 2001)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jun 5, 2001
332 Or. 239 (Or. 2001)
noting that the court's explanation of the concept of discretion in Rogers applies to our review of decisions based on ORCP 64 B
Summary of this case from Golik v. CBS Corp.declining plaintiff's invitation to apply federal case law under FRCP 60(b) because federal rule differs from ORCP 64 B
Summary of this case from Dewolf v. Mt. Hood Ski Bowl, LLCextending liability for wrongful initiation of civil proceedings to "active participants"
Summary of this case from Mantia v. HansonCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jun 5, 2001
Citations
332 Or. 239 (Or. 2001)
Citing Cases
Wallace v. Holden
We concluded that such a dismissal would improperly preclude the plaintiff from pursuing his claim against…
Vokoun v. City of Lake OswegoWhether denominated a claim for "loss of lateral support" or otherwise, plaintiffs' claim for the cost of…