Summary
holding that county’s interpretation was reviewable where the county’s findings made clear how the standard was being interpreted and applied
Summary of this case from Michaelson v. City of PortlandOpinion
1998.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1998
327 Or. 555 (Or. 1998)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1998
327 Or. 555 (Or. 1998)
holding that county’s interpretation was reviewable where the county’s findings made clear how the standard was being interpreted and applied
Summary of this case from Michaelson v. City of Portlandrefining standards of review of LeClair -based determinations; affirming trial court's preclusion of evidence of purported falsity of the victim's prior allegations of sexual abuse
Summary of this case from State v. Bonddiscussing predecessor rule
Summary of this case from State v. BarlettaCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
Citations
327 Or. 555 (Or. 1998)
Citing Cases
Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp.
Viewed in the abstract, the principle applied in Frease, although applied in a novel context in that case,…
State v. Torres-RivasWe review the trial court's evidentiary ruling for errors of law. State v. Arellano, 149 Or.App. 86, 90, 941…