stating that expert testimony determines the standard of conduct for unprofessional conduct and that, where expert witnesses disagree as to adequacy or appropriateness of treatment, the court reviews the board's findings based on that testimony for substantial evidence
Summary of this case from Gambee v. Or. Med. Bd.June 2, 1981.
stating that expert testimony determines the standard of conduct for unprofessional conduct and that, where expert witnesses disagree as to adequacy or appropriateness of treatment, the court reviews the board's findings based on that testimony for substantial evidence
Summary of this case from Gambee v. Or. Med. Bd.allowing declaratory relief where the plaintiff challenged a criminal ordinance that made his business illegal, although he had not been prosecuted under the ordinance
Summary of this case from Berg v. HirschyFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jun 2, 1981
However, as this court has long recognized, a code of professional conduct need not be so detailed as to…
Woolstrum v. Board of ParolePetitioner also contends that the statutory scheme violates due process; however, he makes no argument to…