From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jul 6, 1999
329 Or. 61 (Or. 1999)

Summary

rejecting the argument that the board erred in setting a release date before the good time release date, relying on Bollinger v. Board of Parole, 142 Or. App. 81, 420 P.2d 1111

Summary of this case from State ex rel Gonzalez v. Washington

Opinion

JULY 6, 1999


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jul 6, 1999
329 Or. 61 (Or. 1999)

rejecting the argument that the board erred in setting a release date before the good time release date, relying on Bollinger v. Board of Parole, 142 Or. App. 81, 420 P.2d 1111

Summary of this case from State ex rel Gonzalez v. Washington

reaching the merits of defendant's argument with respect to an untimely MJOA where the state did not object to the motion as untimely and where the trial court had the opportunity to rule, and did rule, on the merits of the parties' contentions

Summary of this case from State v. Long

discussing "generally inherent in every work situation"

Summary of this case from Matter of the Compensation of Shotthafer
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jul 6, 1999

Citations

329 Or. 61 (Or. 1999)

Citing Cases

Havlik v. Multnomah County

" We review the Board's determination that policy changes that resulted in overcrowded conditions for animals…

Wood v. Baldwin

CV96-0332; CA A96576.Argued and submitted on August 27, 1998, affirmed January 13, petition for review denied…