Summary
finding no abuse of discretion in denying motion to continue where counsel had approximately fifty-five days to prepare for trial
Summary of this case from State v. BallardOpinion
1992
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1992
332 N.C. 149 (N.C. 1992)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1992
332 N.C. 149 (N.C. 1992)
finding no abuse of discretion in denying motion to continue where counsel had approximately fifty-five days to prepare for trial
Summary of this case from State v. BallardCase details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
Citations
332 N.C. 149 (N.C. 1992)
Citing Cases
State v. Washington
Defendant argues that the restraint here was insufficient to support a charge of kidnapping. Defendant also…
State v. Shue"The two elements of the crime of attempt are (1) there must be the intent to commit a specific crime and (2)…