From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 31, 1988
322 N.C. 485 (N.C. 1988)

Summary

discussing similar requirements under North Carolina's obscenity statute, found at N.C.G.S. § 14-190.1

Summary of this case from Durham Video & News, Inc. v. Durham Board of Adjustment

Opinion


369 S.E.2d 605 (N.C. 1988) 322 N.C. 485 STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Lee SCOTT. No. 233A88. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 31, 1988

       D. David Steinbock, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

       David W. Dorey, Asst. Appellate Defender, Raleigh, for defendant.

       ORDER

       Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General in this matter for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this matter, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Supersedeas Allowed. By order of the Court in conference, this the 31st day of May 1988."


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 31, 1988
322 N.C. 485 (N.C. 1988)

discussing similar requirements under North Carolina's obscenity statute, found at N.C.G.S. § 14-190.1

Summary of this case from Durham Video & News, Inc. v. Durham Board of Adjustment
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 31, 1988

Citations

322 N.C. 485 (N.C. 1988)
322 N.C. 485

Citing Cases

United States v. Rith

y consent to search because the niece "clearly had joint access to the house inasmuch as she was living with…

State v. Russell

This Court has held that N.C.G.S. 15A-222(3) is "consistent with the language in Matlock . . . that…