Summary
noting this phraseology has been held not to constitute prejudicial error
Summary of this case from State v. SimsOpinion
1992
noting this phraseology has been held not to constitute prejudicial error
Summary of this case from State v. Sims1992
noting this phraseology has been held not to constitute prejudicial error
Summary of this case from State v. SimsFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
The alleged inconsistencies in M.N.M.'s testimony, as well as the credibility of Detective Condry's…
State v. WebsterThe court may examine whether the right was asserted at an early stage of the proceedings, or whether it was…