Petitions for Discretionary Review

Full title: PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 9, 1988

321 N.C. 743 (N.C. 1988)

321 N.C. 743

Opinion

366 S.E.2d 861 (N.C. 1988) 321 N.C. 743 Thelma H. McLAURIN, Widow, and Eleanor Ruth McRorie, Widow v. WINSTON-SALEM SOUTHBOUND RAILWAY COMPANY, a corporation; Seaboard System Railroad, Inc., a corporation; and Landon A. Scarborough. No. 605PA87. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 9, 1988

       Craige, Brawley, Liipferts&sRoss, Winston-Salem, for defendant southbound.

       Henry T. Drake, Wadesboro, for plaintiffs.

       Thomas, Harringtons&sBiedler, Monroe, for defendant Scarborough.

       Foster, Conner, Robsons&sGumbiner, Greensboro, for NCRR.

       Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphreys&sLeonard, Greensboro, for Southern.

       Maupin, Taylor, Elliss&sAdams, Raleigh, for CSCT.

       ORDER

       Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant (Southbound) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. § 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of March 1988."

       Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

       Defendant (Southbound) shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $200.00.