standing for the proposition that selling or buying goods “for substantially less than their fair market value” is evidence that supports the element that the possessor knew or had reasonable grounds to believe the property was stolen
Summary of this case from State v. Flippen1984
standing for the proposition that selling or buying goods “for substantially less than their fair market value” is evidence that supports the element that the possessor knew or had reasonable grounds to believe the property was stolen
Summary of this case from State v. FlippenIn State v. Jones, 310 N.C. 628, 315 S.E.2d 698 (1984), the Supreme Court held that this is not an appropriate aggravating factor to be considered when a defendant is convicted of violating G.S. 14-67 (attempting to burn dwelling houses and certain other buildings). With this holding in mind, we can only conclude that this factor is not an appropriate aggravating factor to be used when a defendant is convicted of first degree arson.
Summary of this case from State v. WatersFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1984
The trial court found as an aggravating factor that "the defendant knowingly created a great risk of death to…
State v. OakleyWe are bound by the conclusions reached in that appeal. These two issues are the law of the case and will…