Summary
holding that because “neither of the plaintiff's employment contracts expressly incorporated the provisions of the UNC Code” the Code was not an enforceable contract
Summary of this case from Samost v. Duke Univ.Opinion
1993
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1993
334 N.C. 433 (N.C. 1993)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1993
334 N.C. 433 (N.C. 1993)
holding that because “neither of the plaintiff's employment contracts expressly incorporated the provisions of the UNC Code” the Code was not an enforceable contract
Summary of this case from Samost v. Duke Univ.Case details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1993
Citations
334 N.C. 433 (N.C. 1993)
Citing Cases
Wallen v. Riverside Sports Center
In Gibson v. Hunsberger, this Court adopted this approach in a case involving a tree falling on a highway, in…
Samost v. Duke Univ.Instead, defendant argues that this case is controlled by our caselaw holding that policies and procedures…