Summary
holding that a unilateral mistake by an unrepresented claimant would not support a decision to set aside a settlement agreement that the plaintiff had signed
Summary of this case from Spivey v. Wright's RoofingOpinion
1991
holding that a unilateral mistake by an unrepresented claimant would not support a decision to set aside a settlement agreement that the plaintiff had signed
Summary of this case from Spivey v. Wright's Roofing1991
holding that a unilateral mistake by an unrepresented claimant would not support a decision to set aside a settlement agreement that the plaintiff had signed
Summary of this case from Spivey v. Wright's RoofingFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1991
N.C.G.S. 97-17 (1991). Such "settlement agreements" include agreements for payment of compensation executed…
Starco, Inc. v. AMG Bonding & Insurance Services, Inc.While defendant AMG militates to the contrary, there is no prohibition against incorporating documents by…