Summary
holding that one witness' testimony concerning the defendant's selling and using cocaine and another witness' testimony that he had previously sold cocaine for the defendant was properly admitted
Summary of this case from State v. FieldsOpinion
Prior report: 94 N.C.App. 20, 380 S.E.2d 360.
Linwood O. Foust, Atty. at Law, Charlotte, for Defendant.
James F. Wyatt, III, Atty. at Law, Charlotte, for Defendant.
Grayson G. Kelley, Asst. Atty. General, Raleigh, for the State.
Peter S. Gilchrist, III, Dist. Atty.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General; and upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of September 1989."
The Petition for Discretionary Review is:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of September 1989."