From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1997
546 Pa. 657 (Pa. 1997)

Summary

explaining that a petition to review medical treatment goes to the question of causal connection, whereas utilization review goes to the question of reasonableness and necessity of medical treatment

Summary of this case from Kastenbaum v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

Opinion

1997


Summaries of

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1997
546 Pa. 657 (Pa. 1997)

explaining that a petition to review medical treatment goes to the question of causal connection, whereas utilization review goes to the question of reasonableness and necessity of medical treatment

Summary of this case from Kastenbaum v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

explaining that a petition to review medical treatment goes to the question of causal connection, whereas utilization review goes to the question of reasonableness and necessity of medical treatment

Summary of this case from Kurtz v. W.C.A.B
Case details for

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 1, 1997

Citations

546 Pa. 657 (Pa. 1997)

Citing Cases

City of Chester v. Public Utility Com

See Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 826 F.…

Werner v. Plater-Zyberk

Thus, if the Third Circuit has not ruled on a specific question, this Court may seek guidance from the…