holding that the claimant, a firefighter/rescue-worker, failed to prove that he had been exposed to abnormal working conditions where he responded to a call and found a man who had committed suicide by hanging
Summary of this case from Isbell v. W.C.A.B1997
holding that the claimant, a firefighter/rescue-worker, failed to prove that he had been exposed to abnormal working conditions where he responded to a call and found a man who had committed suicide by hanging
Summary of this case from Isbell v. W.C.A.BFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1997
Abnormal working conditions can generally be established by comparing the conditions of the claimant to those…
Isbell v. W.C.A.BCity of Scranton v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Hart), 583 A.2d 852 (Pa.Cmwlth. 1990), appeal…