holding that Commonwealth was not required to prosecute defendant for misdemeanor under the Pharmacy Act, rather than under the Drug Act, where Drug Act was more specific than Pharmacy Act
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. McCauley1996
holding that Commonwealth was not required to prosecute defendant for misdemeanor under the Pharmacy Act, rather than under the Drug Act, where Drug Act was more specific than Pharmacy Act
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. McCauleyFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1996
Furthermore, a judicial officer is not immune from criminal prosecution, and like any citizen is subject to…
In re LarsenCommonwealth v. Larsen, 682 A.2d 783, 798 (Pa.Super. 1996). The Supreme Court denied allowance of appeal on…