holding that even though the police "took the precautionary step of reading Miranda rights to a non-custodial suspect", the suspect could not assert the Fifth Amendment right to counsel outside the context of custodial interrogation
Summary of this case from Slwooko v. State1992
holding that even though the police "took the precautionary step of reading Miranda rights to a non-custodial suspect", the suspect could not assert the Fifth Amendment right to counsel outside the context of custodial interrogation
Summary of this case from Slwooko v. Stateholding that even though "the police officer took the precautionary step of reading Miranda rights to a non-custodial suspect," the defendant could not assert the Fifth Amendment right to counsel outside the context of custodial interrogation
Summary of this case from Sapp v. StateFull title:PETITION FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
See, e.g., United States v. Bautista, 145 F.3d 1140, 1148 (10th Cir. 1998); Booker v. Ward, 94 F.3d 1052,…
Sapp v. StateThe Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia and the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, each citing footnote 3…