From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. Zuercher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1994
209 A.D.2d 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 16, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Balio, Wesley, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs' motion for a protective order and denied defendants' cross motion for an order compelling plaintiffs to comply with the discovery demands. Defendants made no factual showing of special, unusual or extraordinary circumstances warranting further discovery (see, Gould v Marone, 197 A.D.2d 862; S.A.B. Enters. v. Village of Athens, 178 A.D.2d 820; Spinosa v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 114 A.D.2d 633; Bandike Assocs. v. B.B.M. Realty Corp., 55 A.D.2d 999).


Summaries of

Peterson v. Zuercher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1994
209 A.D.2d 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Peterson v. Zuercher

Case Details

Full title:MARK D. PETERSON et al., Respondents, v. THOMAS ZUERCHER, JR., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 1005