From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jun 25, 2002
97 S.W.3d 523 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. WD 60251

June 25, 2002

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County; Vernon E. Scoville, III, Judge.

John M. Schilmoeller, Assistant State Public Defender, Jefferson City, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Adriane Dixon Crouse, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Joseph M. Ellis, Judge and Ronald R. Holliger, Judge.


ORDER


Clayton A. Peterson appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Peterson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jun 25, 2002
97 S.W.3d 523 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Peterson v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLAYTON A. PETERSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Jun 25, 2002

Citations

97 S.W.3d 523 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)