From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 19, 1994
643 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-00355.

August 26, 1994. Rehearing Denied September 19, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Bob Barker, J.

Malcom V. McKay of Battaglia, Ross, Dicus Wein, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kimberly D. Nolen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Gary Peterson contends his conviction for second-degree murder must be reversed because the trial court failed to instruct the jury on third-degree felony murder allegedly arising out of an aggravated assault. There was evidence which would support third-degree murder and therefore, it was error to refuse to give the instruction. See Herrington v. State, 538 So.2d 850, 851 (Fla. 1989) ("[I]n the case of degree crimes, requested instructions on all lesser degrees that are supported by the evidence must be given regardless of the allegations of the charging document."). We find no merit in the remaining issue raised by Peterson.

Accordingly, we reverse Peterson's conviction and remand for a new trial.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA, J., concur.


Summaries of

Peterson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 19, 1994
643 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Peterson v. State

Case Details

Full title:GARY PETERSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 19, 1994

Citations

643 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Poole v. State

Once again, we agree with Poole. See Sheridan v. State, 799 So.2d 223, 225 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Peterson v.…

Poole v. State

Once again, we agree with Poole. See Sheridan v. State, 799 So. 2d 223, 225 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Peterson v.…