From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 7, 1987
505 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 85-1582.

April 7, 1987.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Margarita Esquiroz, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and James H. Greason, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Jeri L. Weintraub, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


We affirm the defendant's convictions for first-degree murder and robbery with a firearm upon a holding that the claimed error that the trial court unduly restricted the defendant's cross-examination of his accomplice was not preserved for review by an appropriate proffer of the intended testimony. See Silveira-Hernandez v. State, 495 So.2d 914 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); A. McD. v. State, 422 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Ketrow v. State, 414 So.2d 298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Peterson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 7, 1987
505 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Peterson v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHELLMAN PETERSON, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 7, 1987

Citations

505 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Gallagher v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Occhicone v. State, 570 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1990); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.…