From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Nov 10, 1927
216 N.W. 228 (Minn. 1927)

Opinion

No. 26,383.

November 10, 1927.

Injunction denied.

An injunction should not be granted to owner of real estate where statute gives him right of appeal from confirmation by city council of award of commissioners in condemnation proceeding. [Reporter.]

Eminent Domain, 20 C.J. p. 1169 n. 70.

Plaintiff appealed from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Nye, J., denying his motion for a temporary injunction. Affirmed.

H.V. Mercer and Company, for appellant.

Neil M. Cronin, City Attorney, and Thos. B. Kilbride, Assistant City Attorney, for respondent city.



The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a temporary injunction restraining the defendant city from completing condemnation proceedings instituted pursuant to L. 1925, p. 676, c. 417, to acquire certain lands belonging to the plaintiff for the purpose of widening a city street.

The statute gives a right of appeal to the district court from the order of confirmation of the city council. We are unable to see that the plaintiff may not get appropriate relief upon appeal. If so an injunction should not be granted. Plaintiff's brief states that an appeal has been taken.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Peterson v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Nov 10, 1927
216 N.W. 228 (Minn. 1927)
Case details for

Peterson v. City of Minneapolis

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE G. PETERSON v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS AND ANOTHER

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Nov 10, 1927

Citations

216 N.W. 228 (Minn. 1927)
216 N.W. 228

Citing Cases

Peterson v. City of Minneapolis

1. This case was here on a previous occasion. Peterson v. City of Minneapolis, 172 Minn. 604, 216 N.W. 228.…

Freding v. City of Minneapolis

An appeal is allowed from the action of the city council in such proceedings but none was taken. Plaintiff's…