From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. Capital Link Mgmt.

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Apr 21, 2023
3:21cv951-MCR-HTC (N.D. Fla. Apr. 21, 2023)

Opinion

3:21cv951-MCR-HTC

04-21-2023

WADE PETERSON, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL LINK MANAGEMENT LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

M. CASEY RODGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 6, 2023 (ECF No. 37). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There have been no timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, ECF Doc. 30, and motion for attorneys' fees, ECF Doc. 36, are GRANTED.

3. The clerk is directed to enter a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, Wade Peterson, in the amount of $1,000 in statutory damages and $10,320 in fees and costs.

4. The clerk shall close this file.

DONE AND ORDERED


Summaries of

Peterson v. Capital Link Mgmt.

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Apr 21, 2023
3:21cv951-MCR-HTC (N.D. Fla. Apr. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Peterson v. Capital Link Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:WADE PETERSON, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL LINK MANAGEMENT LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: Apr 21, 2023

Citations

3:21cv951-MCR-HTC (N.D. Fla. Apr. 21, 2023)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Capital Link Mgmt.

Id. (quoting La. Power & Light Co., 50 F.3d at 328). “The Court is itself an expert on reasonable rates and…

Thompson v. Capital Link Mgmt.

Plaintiff cites to other cases in which courts have granted default judgment against the same Defendant for…